Hanford News
Welcome to the Hanford News
Edit Profile
Log Out

Home
News/Archives
Opinions
History
Photos
Press Releases
Documents
Related Links
Contact us
DOE revises contract to manage tank farms
Wednesday March 26th 2008

Invitational FFTF meetings set
Wednesday March 26th 2008

Hanford, nuclear plant boosting security
Wednesday March 26th 2008

Energy Northwest accident plans inadequate, officials say
Wednesday March 26th 2008

Benton commissioner aims to save FFTF
Friday December 21st 2001

Email Story
Print Story

tool name

close
tool goes here
Benton commissioner aims to save FFTF

This story was published Friday December 21st 2001

By Annette Cary, Herald staff writer

The federal government may not have been able to find a use for Hanford's Fast Flux Test Facility, but maybe the community can, Benton County Commissioner Claude Oliver said Thursday.

A day after Energy Secretary Spencer Abraham ordered the research reactor permanently shut down, Oliver began talking of finding a way to take over the reactor as government surplus.

"They say it's headed for the wrecking ball," he said. "Maybe we can have it."

At a Dec. 31 commission meeting, he'll broach a plan to commit $250,000 of county money, possibly from a public works fund, to saving the reactor, he said.

Commissioners Leo Bowman and Max Benitz Jr. said the plan has not yet been presented to them and they'll wait until then to discuss it.

The $250,000 would be used to investigate legal and other issues and pull together a plan. Oliver envisions the community finding a wide range of companies and groups interested in the reactor.

The county is in a better position to do that than the Department of Energy, which took a look at just one proposal, a plan put together by Advanced Nuclear and Medical Systems of Richland, Oliver said.

"Why can't we as a community be given an opportunity to put together a proposal?" he asked. "I want to get away from politics and (DOE headquarters) saying we can't do things."

Wednesday the DOE announced that a plan to commercialize the reactor to produce medical isotopes carried too many financial risks to the government. The current Republican administration agreed with the former Democratic administration that DOE has no use for the reactor and it should be permanently shut down.

DOE figured that if the commercialization plan failed after the reactor was restarted, it could be left with as much as $1 billion in expenses. That includes costs of disposing of unused fuel, the expense of keeping the reactor in standby condition until isotope production began and costs of later decommissioning the reactor.

That compares with estimated costs of about $250 million to shut down the reactor over the next almost six years.

However, supporters of restarting the reactor said the $1 billion figure is inflated and doesn't take into account new money coming into the project, such as $35.8 million from Germany to take unwanted nuclear fuel. Supporters want the reactor used to make isotopes primarily for medicine, including new ways of treating cancer.


Dept. Of Energy: Department of Energy faces huge cost increases

10/07/2008

Fluor: More than 180 Fluor layoffs announced

09/29/2008

Battelle/PNNL: Battelle receives contract extension from DOE

10/06/2008

CH2M Hill: Leak ruled out in probe of Hanford's underground tank waste

08/15/2008

Washington Closure: Hanford crews make progress on 618-7 Burial Ground

08/17/2008

Homeland Security: Murray sees terrorist, fire, other training at HAMMER

08/08/2008

Cleanup: 3 Tri-City companies win $12 million Hanford subcontract

10/02/2008

Energy Northwest: Energy NW's Remington re-appointed to board

09/04/2008

B Reactor: B Reactor named National Historic Landmark

08/26/2008

Vit Plant: Hanford vit plant pigeon problem passes

09/26/2008


Find a Job
Keywords:
Location:



News | History | Related Links | Opinions

Press Releases | Documents